Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 16:52:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B8743330737E3C01AAF404DF693199C8F0A64CEF830E2810E06EE8C70E86C5CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post expresses Peter's opinion that she will eventually be found innocent and her accusers will be found guilty, perhaps on appeal. The sources cited against her prove nothing but the fact she lost today, which everybody knows. The note is not needed and is superfluous. https://www.cpr.org/2024/08/12/tina-peters-trial-verdict/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823284404845781186
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B8743330737E3C01AAF404DF693199C8F0A64CEF830E2810E06EE8C70E86C5CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1723567959574
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823284404845781186B8743330737E3C01AAF404DF693199C8F0A64CEF830E2810E06EE8C70E86C5CD