Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-16 15:01:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4823BFF045E8D184FB5F55B5255BB1B62A4D56A4DAB8C572C1AD13DC18111D69
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post expresses Peter's opinion that she will eventually be found innocent and her accusers will be found guilty, perhaps on appeal. The sources cited against her prove nothing but the fact she lost today, which everybody knows. The note is not needed and is superfluous. https://www.cpr.org/2024/08/12/tina-peters-trial-verdict/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823284404845781186
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4823BFF045E8D184FB5F55B5255BB1B62A4D56A4DAB8C572C1AD13DC18111D69
  • createdAtMillis - 1723820497647
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18232844048457811864823BFF045E8D184FB5F55B5255BB1B62A4D56A4DAB8C572C1AD13DC18111D69