Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 16:21:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3571A465E352DE9320C085647D30CDA0776E0B4A8AE0DD0799C9B425028ABE76
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post expresses Peter's opinion that she will eventually be found innocent and her accusers will be found guilty, perhaps on appeal. The sources cited against her prove nothing but the fact she lost today, which everybody knows. The note is not needed and is superfluous. https://www.cpr.org/2024/08/12/tina-peters-trial-verdict/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823284404845781186
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3571A465E352DE9320C085647D30CDA0776E0B4A8AE0DD0799C9B425028ABE76
  • createdAtMillis - 1723566080334
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18232844048457811863571A465E352DE9320C085647D30CDA0776E0B4A8AE0DD0799C9B425028ABE76