Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 10:57:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A2224202ACCC522DA27704FF068DF29E4DDB45BE0B156C8FB0B7720A8639A40
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post expresses Peter's opinion that she will eventually be found innocent and her accusers will be found guilty, perhaps on appeal. The sources cited against her prove nothing but the fact she lost today, which everybody knows. The note is not needed and is superfluous. https://www.cpr.org/2024/08/12/tina-peters-trial-verdict/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823284404845781186
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A2224202ACCC522DA27704FF068DF29E4DDB45BE0B156C8FB0B7720A8639A40
  • createdAtMillis - 1723546677839
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18232844048457811860A2224202ACCC522DA27704FF068DF29E4DDB45BE0B156C8FB0B7720A8639A40