Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 19:31:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1E36A99CD0337E93F312D2B0F31EAF9AE2FE0B4FD9CED83287C817E003B6727E
Participant Details

Original Note:

"In August 2024, an internal Chinese investigation indicated that the ship was indeed responsible for the damage, claiming it was an accident due to heavy weather rather than intentional sabotage." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newnew_Polar_Bear

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823222567685022104
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1E36A99CD0337E93F312D2B0F31EAF9AE2FE0B4FD9CED83287C817E003B6727E
  • createdAtMillis - 1723663860735
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18232225676850221041E36A99CD0337E93F312D2B0F31EAF9AE2FE0B4FD9CED83287C817E003B6727E