Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 04:09:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7361CA063986218364E192AE238BAADCB51BF0721D23C1B770AF2CD7BDEF651
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, this proposed note is speculative in nature consisting of a totally manufactured narrative crafted from an obvious personal bias designed to mislead the public. Who do you think you are? A legacy media “journalist”?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823219327778037933
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7361CA063986218364E192AE238BAADCB51BF0721D23C1B770AF2CD7BDEF651
  • createdAtMillis - 1723608544701
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823219327778037933E7361CA063986218364E192AE238BAADCB51BF0721D23C1B770AF2CD7BDEF651