Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 04:00:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E6936FECAD2B3310F9F135E9A69218CB64ACB952B1A01C993020757A7F5F410F
Participant Details

Original Note:

La nota publicada presenta algo como hecho cuando no es la realidad. La fotógrafa efectivamente fue victima de un proyectil durante el estallido social, pero no perdió su globo ocular, según explica ella misma en sus redes sociales https://www.instagram.com/p/C-gopyUOaMu/?igsh=MTh3cG13dm15OWg2OA==

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823185336740311282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E6936FECAD2B3310F9F135E9A69218CB64ACB952B1A01C993020757A7F5F410F
  • createdAtMillis - 1723521616146
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823185336740311282E6936FECAD2B3310F9F135E9A69218CB64ACB952B1A01C993020757A7F5F410F