Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 04:45:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B2847AAD371D53D4072B038B66A7D5E97E0998A4A396AB883E7C38166789AC97
Participant Details

Original Note:

La nota publicada presenta algo como hecho cuando no es la realidad. La fotógrafa efectivamente fue victima de un proyectil durante el estallido social, pero no perdió su globo ocular, según explica ella misma en sus redes sociales https://www.instagram.com/p/C-gopyUOaMu/?igsh=MTh3cG13dm15OWg2OA==

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823185336740311282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B2847AAD371D53D4072B038B66A7D5E97E0998A4A396AB883E7C38166789AC97
  • createdAtMillis - 1723610727344
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823185336740311282B2847AAD371D53D4072B038B66A7D5E97E0998A4A396AB883E7C38166789AC97