Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 11:46:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9228C217089E2D152E8EBD6C2CBB5F27C379A49B9A1F7E99D5BFB8C0D6A5BD8A
Participant Details

Original Note:

La nota publicada presenta algo como hecho cuando no es la realidad. La fotógrafa efectivamente fue victima de un proyectil durante el estallido social, pero no perdió su globo ocular, según explica ella misma en sus redes sociales https://www.instagram.com/p/C-gopyUOaMu/?igsh=MTh3cG13dm15OWg2OA==

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823185336740311282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9228C217089E2D152E8EBD6C2CBB5F27C379A49B9A1F7E99D5BFB8C0D6A5BD8A
  • createdAtMillis - 1723549593181
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18231853367403112829228C217089E2D152E8EBD6C2CBB5F27C379A49B9A1F7E99D5BFB8C0D6A5BD8A