Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 20:45:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 563274A2215345DCF3AF304C30EB91E9A67E9ED79C6C20ADA1100E78E9A98B9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

La nota publicada presenta algo como hecho cuando no es la realidad. La fotógrafa efectivamente fue victima de un proyectil durante el estallido social, pero no perdió su globo ocular, según explica ella misma en sus redes sociales https://www.instagram.com/p/C-gopyUOaMu/?igsh=MTh3cG13dm15OWg2OA==

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823185336740311282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 563274A2215345DCF3AF304C30EB91E9A67E9ED79C6C20ADA1100E78E9A98B9B
  • createdAtMillis - 1723668320159
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823185336740311282563274A2215345DCF3AF304C30EB91E9A67E9ED79C6C20ADA1100E78E9A98B9B