Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 03:47:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1CA85F7234F1E21F38D07AC90E66FFD892A75D3A1259D770264F58B74BA083F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

La nota publicada presenta algo como hecho cuando no es la realidad. La fotógrafa efectivamente fue victima de un proyectil durante el estallido social, pero no perdió su globo ocular, según explica ella misma en sus redes sociales https://www.instagram.com/p/C-gopyUOaMu/?igsh=MTh3cG13dm15OWg2OA==

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823185336740311282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1CA85F7234F1E21F38D07AC90E66FFD892A75D3A1259D770264F58B74BA083F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1723520841707
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18231853367403112821CA85F7234F1E21F38D07AC90E66FFD892A75D3A1259D770264F58B74BA083F1