Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 02:03:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4161FB3186A098CD0C2F4A6B17669FFC62AA644C55787DE963F9E19C5CD6010
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, the CN is simply parroting recent revision of evident history. The truth of her assignment, her title, and her lack of performance is right out in the public record. No amount of revision will remove the records from being presented.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823120502396784930
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4161FB3186A098CD0C2F4A6B17669FFC62AA644C55787DE963F9E19C5CD6010
  • createdAtMillis - 1723514582587
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823120502396784930F4161FB3186A098CD0C2F4A6B17669FFC62AA644C55787DE963F9E19C5CD6010