Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 00:28:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93039335E0C607DAAC51930F10527E937A6E3D25877343557A929F2FE3A5DD87
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, the CN is simply parroting recent revision of evident history. The truth of her assignment, her title, and her lack of performance is right out in the public record. No amount of revision will remove the records from being presented.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823120502396784930
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93039335E0C607DAAC51930F10527E937A6E3D25877343557A929F2FE3A5DD87
  • createdAtMillis - 1723508934167
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182312050239678493093039335E0C607DAAC51930F10527E937A6E3D25877343557A929F2FE3A5DD87