Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 03:18:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E321D6B268D523EA09990550F97C07925D73F6207AB691F384F133600D15937
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, the CN is simply parroting recent revision of evident history. The truth of her assignment, her title, and her lack of performance is right out in the public record. No amount of revision will remove the records from being presented.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823120502396784930
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E321D6B268D523EA09990550F97C07925D73F6207AB691F384F133600D15937
  • createdAtMillis - 1723519121484
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18231205023967849304E321D6B268D523EA09990550F97C07925D73F6207AB691F384F133600D15937