Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 03:41:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E83F10C6B61A1A019D1786C5F3D0D923A929E4A6D0A1C42A34708B690B0C9B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, the CN is simply parroting recent revision of evident history. The truth of her assignment, her title, and her lack of performance is right out in the public record. No amount of revision will remove the records from being presented.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823120502396784930
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E83F10C6B61A1A019D1786C5F3D0D923A929E4A6D0A1C42A34708B690B0C9B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1723520488248
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18231205023967849303E83F10C6B61A1A019D1786C5F3D0D923A929E4A6D0A1C42A34708B690B0C9B0