Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 22:52:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3187999C042573911C49F33CA86995FDFE2A96CCF034B8A3C9A398575DC6EF7E
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, the CN is simply parroting recent revision of evident history. The truth of her assignment, her title, and her lack of performance is right out in the public record. No amount of revision will remove the records from being presented.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823120502396784930
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3187999C042573911C49F33CA86995FDFE2A96CCF034B8A3C9A398575DC6EF7E
  • createdAtMillis - 1723503148852
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18231205023967849303187999C042573911C49F33CA86995FDFE2A96CCF034B8A3C9A398575DC6EF7E