Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 04:57:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F669EF6D285A69DA3ECFD771F4AC932E5C2DE05710FB7E8CDA95B98E492BB798
Participant Details

Original Note:

The screenshots are clearly doctored at the account level for starters. Therefore there is no telling if that is all that has been doctored and should not be shared and represented as fact. The entire account has been wiped as well - so no chance to check either. Www.twitter.com >

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823113993969357006
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F669EF6D285A69DA3ECFD771F4AC932E5C2DE05710FB7E8CDA95B98E492BB798
  • createdAtMillis - 1723525035907
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1823113993969357006F669EF6D285A69DA3ECFD771F4AC932E5C2DE05710FB7E8CDA95B98E492BB798