Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 21:46:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6B3EB34FC626E147C64630F372DE2D80716E77FF2CCE3D492BF32E3662E92710
Participant Details

Original Note:

This poll was conducted without using a verified polling method, and objectivity cannot be guaranteed in either the presentation of the questions or the responses. The poll lacks context and is misleading in relation to the actual figures. https://esomar.org/code-and-guidelines

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823077739294826509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6B3EB34FC626E147C64630F372DE2D80716E77FF2CCE3D492BF32E3662E92710
  • createdAtMillis - 1723499170771
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18230777392948265096B3EB34FC626E147C64630F372DE2D80716E77FF2CCE3D492BF32E3662E92710