Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 02:49:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F9FB5122BB97DD0D7EC8F6E63373E6DBDF346B99BC1067ADE1ECDEC20630931
Participant Details

Original Note:

This poll was conducted without using a verified polling method, and objectivity cannot be guaranteed in either the presentation of the questions or the responses. The poll lacks context and is misleading in relation to the actual figures. https://esomar.org/code-and-guidelines

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823077739294826509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F9FB5122BB97DD0D7EC8F6E63373E6DBDF346B99BC1067ADE1ECDEC20630931
  • createdAtMillis - 1723517397621
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18230777392948265094F9FB5122BB97DD0D7EC8F6E63373E6DBDF346B99BC1067ADE1ECDEC20630931