Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 02:16:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 464BA0E5DA9B03483CAA36F54FF397789173FE378EBF4727B52C7964DDFBA4F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

This poll was conducted without using a verified polling method, and objectivity cannot be guaranteed in either the presentation of the questions or the responses. The poll lacks context and is misleading in relation to the actual figures. https://esomar.org/code-and-guidelines

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823077739294826509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 464BA0E5DA9B03483CAA36F54FF397789173FE378EBF4727B52C7964DDFBA4F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1723515408456
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1823077739294826509464BA0E5DA9B03483CAA36F54FF397789173FE378EBF4727B52C7964DDFBA4F4