Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 14:27:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 42FEC0F1CD02299E680BE3662EEFE1B01DBFFF4B165CF2B61A5FE4F35082FC50
Participant Details

Original Note:

This poll was conducted without using a verified polling method, and objectivity cannot be guaranteed in either the presentation of the questions or the responses. The poll lacks context and is misleading in relation to the actual figures. https://esomar.org/code-and-guidelines

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823077739294826509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 42FEC0F1CD02299E680BE3662EEFE1B01DBFFF4B165CF2B61A5FE4F35082FC50
  • createdAtMillis - 1723559248798
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 182307773929482650942FEC0F1CD02299E680BE3662EEFE1B01DBFFF4B165CF2B61A5FE4F35082FC50