Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 08:00:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4166FF6CF9A5F172846F9F38D6DD8D8C2CE31EF4F2373FC1B9517704F6B7EC8
Participant Details

Original Note:

There was no such study ever done, let alone published as such by Lancet. The tweet misleadingly refers to a letter that was sent to and then published by Lancet. The reader-submitted article is clearly labeled "CORRESPONDENCE" above the title on their web site: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823059591518703842
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4166FF6CF9A5F172846F9F38D6DD8D8C2CE31EF4F2373FC1B9517704F6B7EC8
  • createdAtMillis - 1723536019864
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823059591518703842D4166FF6CF9A5F172846F9F38D6DD8D8C2CE31EF4F2373FC1B9517704F6B7EC8