Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 08:55:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 555337DB5227D5F5970566FB05DDD56850EBC6813657678DB485AAEE7C26CA46
Participant Details

Original Note:

There was no such study ever done, let alone published as such by Lancet. The tweet misleadingly refers to a letter that was sent to and then published by Lancet. The reader-submitted article is clearly labeled "CORRESPONDENCE" above the title on their web site: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823059591518703842
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 555337DB5227D5F5970566FB05DDD56850EBC6813657678DB485AAEE7C26CA46
  • createdAtMillis - 1723539318857
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823059591518703842555337DB5227D5F5970566FB05DDD56850EBC6813657678DB485AAEE7C26CA46