Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 09:04:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 402DC23553D4A71A5B3F73430AF4B549C73597624A2BDD245632BF8BE55D08DC
Participant Details

Original Note:

There was no such study ever done, let alone published as such by Lancet. The tweet misleadingly refers to a letter that was sent to and then published by Lancet. The reader-submitted article is clearly labeled "CORRESPONDENCE" above the title on their web site: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823059591518703842
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 402DC23553D4A71A5B3F73430AF4B549C73597624A2BDD245632BF8BE55D08DC
  • createdAtMillis - 1723539891161
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823059591518703842402DC23553D4A71A5B3F73430AF4B549C73597624A2BDD245632BF8BE55D08DC