Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 07:54:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 06B592EA5EB53D5654BE281825AF02F330D475E19CFA068F3711D7A763DBA3BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

There was no such study ever done, let alone published as such by Lancet. The tweet misleadingly refers to a letter that was sent to and then published by Lancet. The reader-submitted article is clearly labeled "CORRESPONDENCE" above the title on their web site: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823059591518703842
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 06B592EA5EB53D5654BE281825AF02F330D475E19CFA068F3711D7A763DBA3BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1723535655764
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 182305959151870384206B592EA5EB53D5654BE281825AF02F330D475E19CFA068F3711D7A763DBA3BA