Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 05:56:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D87FDF5EC7464966C3D9659BEC9B67F287D92AB04018C944CB2E735921A08BBC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Walz didn’t correct the introduction, thereby agreeing with it and allowing the implication. You can disagree with that, but take it to the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823044606373544178
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D87FDF5EC7464966C3D9659BEC9B67F287D92AB04018C944CB2E735921A08BBC
  • createdAtMillis - 1723528606715
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823044606373544178D87FDF5EC7464966C3D9659BEC9B67F287D92AB04018C944CB2E735921A08BBC