Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 00:48:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4D9251CD423B7AB78580846B7346C6AF33216751064BF03DD478A4398279A578
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Walz didn’t correct the introduction, thereby agreeing with it and allowing the implication. You can disagree with that, but take it to the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823044606373544178
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4D9251CD423B7AB78580846B7346C6AF33216751064BF03DD478A4398279A578
  • createdAtMillis - 1723510092369
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18230446063735441784D9251CD423B7AB78580846B7346C6AF33216751064BF03DD478A4398279A578