Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 16:23:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F9ED4DE7B1A6725E1003CFEB22FC94FBBC87617D5686C6DD03F7F76312333DF5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Post misleads by stating Walz retired before his unit received "official" deployment orders, ignoring widely available evidence (also not addressed in the linked article) that Walz knew of deployment-and stated that he intended to deploy-before the official orders were issued. https://web.archive.org/web/20050420005951/http://www.timwalz.org/print.php?pr=1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1823018970200391704
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F9ED4DE7B1A6725E1003CFEB22FC94FBBC87617D5686C6DD03F7F76312333DF5
createdAtMillis - 1723479832445
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1823018970200391704F9ED4DE7B1A6725E1003CFEB22FC94FBBC87617D5686C6DD03F7F76312333DF5