Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 23:37:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26CDAF3B518E6D14944ED5B498529E8BD46D29849FB05B250431FB407CDCFD22
Participant Details

Original Note:

Post misleads by stating Walz retired before his unit received "official" deployment orders, ignoring widely available evidence (also not addressed in the linked article) that Walz knew of deployment-and stated that he intended to deploy-before the official orders were issued. https://web.archive.org/web/20050420005951/http://www.timwalz.org/print.php?pr=1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1823018970200391704
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 26CDAF3B518E6D14944ED5B498529E8BD46D29849FB05B250431FB407CDCFD22
createdAtMillis - 1723592245550
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 182301897020039170426CDAF3B518E6D14944ED5B498529E8BD46D29849FB05B250431FB407CDCFD22