Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 23:18:04 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 481505C17E6A0C67A99A44DD64293B8531502D2FE09955BACC8AF6CC8F82CBA6
Participant Details

Original Note:

 https://t.co/7viLobHN8J 「新型コロナワクチンは病気の予防や感染の拡散阻止に効果がないため、ワクチンとは認められない」 との裁定ではなく、 原告の反ワクチンの主張がどれほど馬鹿げていても再審請求は認めざるを得ない とするものです we must accept the plaintiffs’ alleged facts as true, whether “actual proof” of them is “improbable” 「原告の主張を真実として受けいれねばならない、たとえ「実際の証明」が「あり得ないようなもの」だとしても」

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822973577077158048
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 481505C17E6A0C67A99A44DD64293B8531502D2FE09955BACC8AF6CC8F82CBA6
  • createdAtMillis - 1723504684219
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822973577077158048481505C17E6A0C67A99A44DD64293B8531502D2FE09955BACC8AF6CC8F82CBA6