Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 13:50:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EDBBCDC6FD9FB627F047389BACC48AAFDB55EF8D62CC0711CC999A7C2E7C348C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note makes assumptions. It is unclear whether Meta decided to delete the account based on Dawkins' posts on X or whether it was hacked. At this point, given no other evidence, we can leave it to the reader to decide whether Dawkins' allegation is credible.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822963609158258962
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EDBBCDC6FD9FB627F047389BACC48AAFDB55EF8D62CC0711CC999A7C2E7C348C
  • createdAtMillis - 1723470614497
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822963609158258962EDBBCDC6FD9FB627F047389BACC48AAFDB55EF8D62CC0711CC999A7C2E7C348C