Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 11:57:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BA0D60F2BD5943390C60FCECAD5AFA5609D5B751A7F23D220F94566F17F347A2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note makes assumptions. It is unclear whether Meta decided to delete the account based on Dawkins' posts on X or whether it was hacked. At this point, given no other evidence, we can leave it to the reader to decide whether Dawkins' allegation is credible.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822963609158258962
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BA0D60F2BD5943390C60FCECAD5AFA5609D5B751A7F23D220F94566F17F347A2
  • createdAtMillis - 1723463860134
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822963609158258962BA0D60F2BD5943390C60FCECAD5AFA5609D5B751A7F23D220F94566F17F347A2