Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-18 04:54:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 92B7B5607222199CC84E4202E1F02FC8FC02CB46980B5C8A58C8BE8EFBAFD8A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note makes assumptions. It is unclear whether Meta decided to delete the account based on Dawkins' posts on X or whether it was hacked. At this point, given no other evidence, we can leave it to the reader to decide whether Dawkins' allegation is credible.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822963609158258962
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 92B7B5607222199CC84E4202E1F02FC8FC02CB46980B5C8A58C8BE8EFBAFD8A9
  • createdAtMillis - 1723956877066
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182296360915825896292B7B5607222199CC84E4202E1F02FC8FC02CB46980B5C8A58C8BE8EFBAFD8A9