Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 12:55:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6DB585EF0B2DB69989816A5E903BBBD85E7BC07E6F2D000F74410347C0461C6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note makes assumptions. It is unclear whether Meta decided to delete the account based on Dawkins' posts on X or whether it was hacked. At this point, given no other evidence, we can leave it to the reader to decide whether Dawkins' allegation is credible.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822963609158258962
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6DB585EF0B2DB69989816A5E903BBBD85E7BC07E6F2D000F74410347C0461C6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723467331807
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18229636091582589626DB585EF0B2DB69989816A5E903BBBD85E7BC07E6F2D000F74410347C0461C6D