Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 13:54:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 50FCD9CE6E3B030A3AF1B9C4F9A8C4BE9AF3327CA1B23E7D03B06FC61B947444
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note makes assumptions. It is unclear whether Meta decided to delete the account based on Dawkins' posts on X or whether it was hacked. At this point, given no other evidence, we can leave it to the reader to decide whether Dawkins' allegation is credible.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822963609158258962
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 50FCD9CE6E3B030A3AF1B9C4F9A8C4BE9AF3327CA1B23E7D03B06FC61B947444
  • createdAtMillis - 1723470889421
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182296360915825896250FCD9CE6E3B030A3AF1B9C4F9A8C4BE9AF3327CA1B23E7D03B06FC61B947444