Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 03:53:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FDE93F79DB8374F30B2FB2EFEA818403AAE7C96A334A12ADCD2F3FE20BED4CE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NNNs in this thread do not address the lack of a sound methodological basis to the study cited. The results of surveys depend on such matters as the precise wording of questions, and the sampling techniques employed. Without details of these, the results are meaningless https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601897/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822917182629576853
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FDE93F79DB8374F30B2FB2EFEA818403AAE7C96A334A12ADCD2F3FE20BED4CE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1723521197914
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1822917182629576853FDE93F79DB8374F30B2FB2EFEA818403AAE7C96A334A12ADCD2F3FE20BED4CE5