Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 01:46:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE3A7A54E40BD9C7ADACD1E2DC9C08D78CA78FA05E5663A070457FC4BF4936E1
Participant Details

Original Note:

早期復旧困難地区については、土砂崩れなどやむを得ない事情もありますが、停電や、作業員の高齢化などの理由も挙げられており、本投稿の「水道も通せない」という指摘は、誤解を招いているわけではありません。そのためノートは不要です。 https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/1266803?display=1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822796128183853350
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE3A7A54E40BD9C7ADACD1E2DC9C08D78CA78FA05E5663A070457FC4BF4936E1
  • createdAtMillis - 1723427195852
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822796128183853350CE3A7A54E40BD9C7ADACD1E2DC9C08D78CA78FA05E5663A070457FC4BF4936E1