Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 01:18:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 474D764BC93D5CB36D2EC34EBF4F80C722B947E94973F0E2339010DFBFA42FFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

早期復旧困難地区については、土砂崩れなどやむを得ない事情もありますが、停電や、作業員の高齢化などの理由も挙げられており、本投稿の「水道も通せない」という指摘は、誤解を招いているわけではありません。そのためノートは不要です。 https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/1266803?display=1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822796128183853350
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 474D764BC93D5CB36D2EC34EBF4F80C722B947E94973F0E2339010DFBFA42FFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1723511931129
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822796128183853350474D764BC93D5CB36D2EC34EBF4F80C722B947E94973F0E2339010DFBFA42FFB