Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 06:03:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4669E05B54CBD9E0093C0C5418BFBFC2EEF67B8ACB974CA714EEBD02BE1078B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

早期復旧困難地区については、土砂崩れなどやむを得ない事情もありますが、停電や、作業員の高齢化などの理由も挙げられており、本投稿の「水道も通せない」という指摘は、誤解を招いているわけではありません。そのためノートは不要です。 https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/1266803?display=1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822796128183853350
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4669E05B54CBD9E0093C0C5418BFBFC2EEF67B8ACB974CA714EEBD02BE1078B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1723528988541
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18227961281838533504669E05B54CBD9E0093C0C5418BFBFC2EEF67B8ACB974CA714EEBD02BE1078B5