Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-11 13:23:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5898B1C9B51F841B65BED5769272F0B2D935E218BC1522A6B03946A31F6A76E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The op is using this as a case study example rather than a claim and therefore not misleading, however it would have proven useful had the op explained when and what initially the speech was in reference to, so the correct points can be considered in relation to politics today

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822542457667461450
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5898B1C9B51F841B65BED5769272F0B2D935E218BC1522A6B03946A31F6A76E
  • createdAtMillis - 1723382629907
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822542457667461450F5898B1C9B51F841B65BED5769272F0B2D935E218BC1522A6B03946A31F6A76E