Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-11 12:08:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E66C6A45B29D10400313FDFACECC1CC95901993F9D5377CB84A51B1209B2ECCF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The op is using this as a case study example rather than a claim and therefore not misleading, however it would have proven useful had the op explained when and what initially the speech was in reference to, so the correct points can be considered in relation to politics today

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822542457667461450
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E66C6A45B29D10400313FDFACECC1CC95901993F9D5377CB84A51B1209B2ECCF
  • createdAtMillis - 1723378137358
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822542457667461450E66C6A45B29D10400313FDFACECC1CC95901993F9D5377CB84A51B1209B2ECCF