Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-11 10:47:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A68902B1E2E5CB84AE8859B6786A941646D6B2BF05165A4FB916ACB651AFC2BF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The op is using this as a case study example rather than a claim and therefore not misleading, however it would have proven useful had the op explained when and what initially the speech was in reference to, so the correct points can be considered in relation to politics today

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822542457667461450
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A68902B1E2E5CB84AE8859B6786A941646D6B2BF05165A4FB916ACB651AFC2BF
  • createdAtMillis - 1723373248952
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822542457667461450A68902B1E2E5CB84AE8859B6786A941646D6B2BF05165A4FB916ACB651AFC2BF