Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 04:30:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E4906572FE8917E4AA3C70C41E776C4D9277A07A0277392FD9BD093758836A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The op is using this as a case study example rather than a claim and therefore not misleading, however it would have proven useful had the op explained when and what initially the speech was in reference to, so the correct points can be considered in relation to politics today

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822542457667461450
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E4906572FE8917E4AA3C70C41E776C4D9277A07A0277392FD9BD093758836A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1723437014880
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18225424576674614500E4906572FE8917E4AA3C70C41E776C4D9277A07A0277392FD9BD093758836A4