Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-11 00:33:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF4D8038C8F4CADDD727E1141E03E8EE71101ECEAB78C0971E122FB398EBD185
Participant Details

Original Note:

There was no cheating done. According to the CAS ruling, the U.S. filed the inquiry 4 seconds past the allotted time. That is why it was overturned, not due to any cheating like this post alleges. It is also unclear whether the U.S. knew that they were past time. https://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/CAS_Media_Release_ParisOG_15-16.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822403338941694331
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF4D8038C8F4CADDD727E1141E03E8EE71101ECEAB78C0971E122FB398EBD185
  • createdAtMillis - 1723336382580
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822403338941694331BF4D8038C8F4CADDD727E1141E03E8EE71101ECEAB78C0971E122FB398EBD185