Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 23:59:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EA16FB7726BE9E7C167A0C8C98946EE32C320B4246054FEBA60BC10AEC2F1F0B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Digitally altered still. Note the difference from once frame to the next. Also note that the judge's facial features, while clearly visible in the entire video, become completely, cartoonishly muddied in the still. https://bit.ly/4dCyCBw https://bit.ly/4dEoSXu

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822357328055951643
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EA16FB7726BE9E7C167A0C8C98946EE32C320B4246054FEBA60BC10AEC2F1F0B
  • createdAtMillis - 1723334387095
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822357328055951643EA16FB7726BE9E7C167A0C8C98946EE32C320B4246054FEBA60BC10AEC2F1F0B