Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-11 06:18:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DC59632A4D927C76F52F65B2B1502127ECC4C07D05BB57590E8209D27938C0A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Digitally altered still. Note the difference from once frame to the next. Also note that the judge's facial features, while clearly visible in the entire video, become completely, cartoonishly muddied in the still. https://bit.ly/4dCyCBw https://bit.ly/4dEoSXu

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822357328055951643
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DC59632A4D927C76F52F65B2B1502127ECC4C07D05BB57590E8209D27938C0A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1723357111487
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1822357328055951643DC59632A4D927C76F52F65B2B1502127ECC4C07D05BB57590E8209D27938C0A4