Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 22:49:24 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48F520FE637A953D59A9E029C1A6C4F3F7F5F7C773CB357270C1EA5230EA3401
Participant Details

Original Note:

Digitally altered still. Note the difference from once frame to the next. Also note that the judge's facial features, while clearly visible in the entire video, become completely, cartoonishly muddied in the still. https://bit.ly/4dCyCBw https://bit.ly/4dEoSXu

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822357328055951643
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48F520FE637A953D59A9E029C1A6C4F3F7F5F7C773CB357270C1EA5230EA3401
  • createdAtMillis - 1723330164759
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182235732805595164348F520FE637A953D59A9E029C1A6C4F3F7F5F7C773CB357270C1EA5230EA3401