Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-11 09:56:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 38500647F383B8AB66EEE420AC8F5484BF0EFC970F6768807850A42F07E35B12
Participant Details

Original Note:

Digitally altered still. Note the difference from once frame to the next. Also note that the judge's facial features, while clearly visible in the entire video, become completely, cartoonishly muddied in the still. https://bit.ly/4dCyCBw https://bit.ly/4dEoSXu

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822357328055951643
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 38500647F383B8AB66EEE420AC8F5484BF0EFC970F6768807850A42F07E35B12
  • createdAtMillis - 1723370190073
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 182235732805595164338500647F383B8AB66EEE420AC8F5484BF0EFC970F6768807850A42F07E35B12