Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 18:44:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7137AD55E7427FD1D91BA5C6F8CC870201B0AF529DFFD54A511BC3F28BE39466
Participant Details

Original Note:

I listened twice and wasn't exactly sure what he said, so the other people objecting aren't either. It is not unusual for him to use foul language to describe women, this is a term he uses, so not at all surprising to hear. You can't say it didn't happen because you vote for him.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822342540970147911
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7137AD55E7427FD1D91BA5C6F8CC870201B0AF529DFFD54A511BC3F28BE39466
  • createdAtMillis - 1723315480390
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18223425409701479117137AD55E7427FD1D91BA5C6F8CC870201B0AF529DFFD54A511BC3F28BE39466