Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 21:37:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6C38728EA6FD2A00533973094A10934831C7643763B3FCB6D5F1F76435BB003E
Participant Details

Original Note:

I listened twice and wasn't exactly sure what he said, so the other people objecting aren't either. It is not unusual for him to use foul language to describe women, this is a term he uses, so not at all surprising to hear. You can't say it didn't happen because you vote for him.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822342540970147911
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6C38728EA6FD2A00533973094A10934831C7643763B3FCB6D5F1F76435BB003E
  • createdAtMillis - 1723325824823
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18223425409701479116C38728EA6FD2A00533973094A10934831C7643763B3FCB6D5F1F76435BB003E